!jupyter nbconvert --to html "/content/drive/MyDrive/Study Material/SN_Fitting_Toy_Example.ipynb"
[NbConvertApp] Converting notebook /content/drive/MyDrive/Study Material/SN_Fitting_Toy_Example.ipynb to html [NbConvertApp] Writing 1523516 bytes to /content/drive/MyDrive/Study Material/SN_Fitting_Toy_Example.html
Scenario : An astronomer observes a distant Type Ia supernova. The goal is to use this supernova to estimate the distance to its host galaxy, which can then provide information about the expansion rate of the Universe.
Steps :
Observation : The astronomer collects data across a range of wavelengths (from ultraviolet to near-infrared) over several weeks, mapping out the light curve of the supernova in each wavelength band.
SED Construction : For each observed time point, the astronomer constructs the SED by plotting the luminosity of the supernova against wavelength.
SED Fitting with a Model : Using a model (like SALT2), the astronomer fits the observed SEDs. This provides two crucial parameters:
Standardization : Using the above parameters, the supernova's observed brightness is adjusted or "standardized." This means that even though not all Type Ia supernovae have the same intrinsic brightness, their light curves can be adjusted in a consistent way to act as "standard candles."
Distance Estimation : Using the standardized brightness and the observed brightness, the astronomer can estimate the distance modulus, and from that, the distance to the supernova (and its host galaxy).
Cosmological Implication : By observing many such supernovae at various distances (and hence, redshifts), the astronomer can plot the redshift against distance. The shape of this plot reveals the expansion history of the Universe. If the Universe's expansion is accelerating, this will be evident in the curve.
To visualize this, let's plot a simplified "SED" for our toy supernova and then show how it might look after fitting with a model.
Here's our toy plot:
By fitting the observed SED with the model (as shown), the astronomer can derive parameters like ( x_1 ) (shape/stretch of the light curve) and ( c ) (color at peak brightness). These parameters help in "standardizing" the supernova's brightness, turning it into a reliable distance indicator.
Once the supernova's intrinsic brightness is known, comparing it to the observed brightness gives the distance to the supernova and its host galaxy. By repeating this process for many supernovae at various redshifts, the astronomer can derive the expansion history of the Universe.
In the real world, the process is more complex, with sophisticated models and detailed SEDs. But this toy example gives a conceptual overview of how SEDs of supernovae are used in cosmological studies.
# @title
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Toy SED for the supernova at maximum light
wavelengths = np.linspace(100, 1000, 100) # Arbitrary units for wavelength
luminosity = np.exp(-((wavelengths - 500)/100)**2) + 0.1 * np.exp(-((wavelengths - 300)/50)**2) # Toy SED
# Toy model SED (e.g., from SALT2)
model_luminosity = np.exp(-((wavelengths - 500)/90)**2)
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(5, 4))
plt.plot(wavelengths, luminosity, label='Observed Supernova SED', color='blue')
plt.plot(wavelengths, model_luminosity, label='Model SED', linestyle='--', color='red')
plt.xlabel('Wavelength (Arbitrary Units)')
plt.ylabel('Luminosity (Arbitrary Units)')
plt.title('Toy Supernova Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) at Maximum Light')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
plt.show()
The SEDs are fitted for each filter observatons ?
or all filter observations are condensed into one ?
and then fittted with the SED ?
alo are SEDs generally available for a specific wavelength limit ?
or it can be extended as much possible ?
all with respect to supernova ?
Fitting SEDs for Each Filter vs. All Filters Together :
Wavelength Limits of SEDs :
Extending the SED :
In summary, while constructing and modeling the SED of a supernova, data from all available filters are typically combined to provide a comprehensive view of the supernova's emission across wavelengths. The effective range of the SED is determined by both the observational capabilities and the emission characteristics of the supernova itself.
First, let's consider the raw observations. When a supernova is observed, data is collected in multiple filters (e.g., UV, blue, green, red, infrared). For each filter, you get a light curve, which is a plot of brightness (or flux) versus time.
For each time point in these light curves, you can take the fluxes from each filter to construct an SED. The SED at a specific time shows the energy distribution of the supernova across different wavelengths at that moment.
When you fit this observed SED with a model like SALT2, the model tries to reproduce the observed SED using a combination of model components. These components are based on a vast amount of prior supernova data. The SALT2 model, for instance, has a series of template spectra that it linearly combines to fit the observed SED.
From this fitting process, you derive parameters that best describe how to adjust the model to fit the observed SED. Two of the most crucial parameters are:
Stretch (( x_1 )) : This parameter describes how "stretched" or "compressed" the light curve is compared to a standard Type Ia supernova light curve in the model. A positive ( x_1 ) value indicates a broader light curve, meaning the supernova took longer to rise and fall in brightness compared to the standard. A broader light curve also typically corresponds to a brighter supernova.
Color (( c )) : This parameter characterizes the color of the supernova at its peak brightness. In essence, it's describing the difference in brightness between two specific filters (often something like B-band and V-band). This parameter can account for intrinsic color differences in supernovae and for reddening due to dust in the host galaxy or along the line of sight.
The stretch parameter (( x_1 )) affects the time evolution of the SED. If the light curve is stretched, the SED's evolution will be slower. This means, for instance, that the time it takes for the SED to shift from being UV-dominant to red-dominant will be longer for a supernova with a larger ( x_1 ).
The color parameter (( c )) influences the relative fluxes at different wavelengths in the SED. A "redder" supernova (with a higher ( c ) value) will have an SED that is suppressed in the blue/UV part and enhanced in the red part compared to a "bluer" supernova.
By fitting the model to the observed SED over multiple epochs (time points), the model provides the best-fit values of ( x_1 ) and ( c ) that describe the observed evolution and color of the supernova. Once these parameters are determined, they can be used to "standardize" the supernova's brightness, making it a more reliable distance indicator.
The SALT2 model for Type Ia supernovae uses a linear combination of template functions to fit the observed light curves. Once this fit is done, the derived parameters can be used to determine the distance modulus of the supernova. One of the most commonly used formulations for the distance modulus, which incorporates the stretch (( x_1 )) and color (( c )) parameters, is:
$ \mu = m_B - M + \alpha x_1 - \beta c $
Where:
This equation serves as a way to "standardize" the observed peak brightness of the supernova. By incorporating the effects of stretch (( x_1 )) and color (( c )), the equation allows Type Ia supernovae, which are not all exactly the same intrinsic brightness, to serve as "standard candles" for measuring distances. The parameters ( \alpha ) and ( \beta ) are determined empirically from a set of well-observed supernovae, and they're crucial for this standardization process.
Let's visually represent how the stretch ( x_1 ) and color ( c ) parameters affect the observed peak brightness of a supernova and how they relate to the distance modulus ( \mu ).
We'll do the following:
For simplicity, I'll use arbitrary values for ( M ), ( \alpha ), and ( \beta ). Let's proceed with this visualization.
It seems we encountered a technical issue with the plotting. Let me try to generate the plots again.
I apologize for the oversight. It appears that after the technical hiccup, I need to reinitialize the environment and variables. Let's set everything up again and then proceed with the plots.
Here are the visualizations:
Distance Modulus vs. Stretch :
Distance Modulus vs. Color :
Both of these plots provide a visual representation of how the stretch and color parameters, derived from the SED fitting, influence the apparent brightness (and thus the inferred distance) of a Type Ia supernova. By understanding and calibrating these relationships, astronomers can use Type Ia supernovae as "standard candles" to measure distances across the universe.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Arbitrary parameters for the demonstration
M = -19.3 # Absolute magnitude of a "standard" supernova
alpha = 0.15
beta = 3.0
# Generate hypothetical supernovae data
num_supernovae = 100
x1_values = np.random.normal(0, 1, num_supernovae) # Random stretch values around 0
c_values = np.random.normal(0, 0.1, num_supernovae) # Random color values around 0
mB_values = M + alpha * x1_values - beta * c_values + np.random.normal(0, 0.1, num_supernovae) # Adding some noise
# Calculate the distance modulus for each supernova using the equation
mu_values = mB_values - M + alpha * x1_values - beta * c_values
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(7, 4))
# Plot for x1 vs. mu
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.scatter(x1_values, mu_values, c=c_values, cmap='viridis', edgecolor='k')
plt.colorbar(label='Color (c)')
plt.xlabel('Stretch ($x_1$)')
plt.ylabel('Distance Modulus ($\mu$)')
plt.title('Distance Modulus vs. Stretch')
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
# Plot for c vs. mu
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.scatter(c_values, mu_values, c=x1_values, cmap='viridis', edgecolor='k')
plt.colorbar(label='Stretch ($x_1$)')
plt.xlabel('Color (c)')
plt.ylabel('Distance Modulus ($\mu$)')
plt.title('Distance Modulus vs. Color')
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Let's break down the relationship between ( \alpha ), ( x_1 ), ( \beta ), and ( c ) and clarify which are fit and which are not.
Both ( x_1 ) and ( c ) are fit parameters. They are determined for each individual supernova based on its observed light curves and SED.
Both ( \alpha ) and ( \beta ) are calibration constants. They are determined to "standardize" the brightness of Type Ia supernovae, so they can serve as "standard candles" for cosmology.
Let's create a simple toy example to demonstrate this:
Let's proceed with this example.
In the plot above:
From this plot, you can see that if ( \alpha ) and ( \beta ) are not accurately known, the estimated distances to the supernovae (as represented by the distance modulus) can deviate from their true values. This demonstrates the importance of accurately determining ( \alpha ) and ( \beta ) from a well-sampled set of supernovae to ensure that Type Ia supernovae can be reliably used as standard candles in cosmology.
In the real world, determining ( \alpha ) and ( \beta ) involves a more complex process that takes into account various uncertainties and uses a larger dataset of supernovae. But this toy example provides a conceptual illustration of their roles and importance.
# Generating toy supernovae data
# True alpha and beta values for this simulation
true_alpha = 0.14
true_beta = 2.8
# Generate random x1 and c values for our toy supernovae
x1_values = np.random.normal(0, 1, num_supernovae)
c_values = np.random.normal(0, 0.1, num_supernovae)
# Assign a true distance modulus to each supernova based on the true alpha and beta
# For simplicity, we'll use a constant base distance modulus for all supernovae.
base_distance_modulus = 40
true_mu_values = base_distance_modulus + true_alpha * x1_values - true_beta * c_values
# Now, let's pretend we don't know the true alpha and beta.
# We'll use slightly off values to estimate the distance modulus and see the difference.
estimated_alpha = 0.16
estimated_beta = 2.6
estimated_mu_values = base_distance_modulus + estimated_alpha * x1_values - estimated_beta * c_values
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 5))
# Plot the true vs estimated distance moduli
plt.scatter(true_mu_values, estimated_mu_values, c=x1_values, cmap='viridis', edgecolor='k')
plt.colorbar(label='Stretch ($x_1$)')
plt.plot([min(true_mu_values), max(true_mu_values)], [min(true_mu_values), max(true_mu_values)], 'r--', label="True = Estimated")
plt.xlabel('True Distance Modulus')
plt.ylabel('Estimated Distance Modulus')
plt.title('Comparison of True vs. Estimated Distance Moduli')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
plt.show()
Let's walk through the steps of a supernova survey, focusing on the use of Type Ia supernovae as distance indicators:
Outcome : For each supernova, derive parameters like ( x_1 ) (stretch) and ( c ) (color).
(Here we can visualize the observed light curve and the model fit to illustrate this step.)
Outcome : Values of ( \alpha ) and ( \beta ) that standardize supernova brightness across the survey.
(We can plot a scatter of ( x_1 ) vs. intrinsic brightness and ( c ) vs. intrinsic brightness for this calibration set.)
Outcome : Distance estimates to each supernova's host galaxy.
(We can visualize the distribution of estimated distances.)
Outcome : Insights into the expansion history of the universe.
(A Hubble diagram, plotting distance modulus against redshift, can illustrate this step.)
Let's generate some illustrative plots for steps 3, 4, and 5 to visualize the process. We'll use a toy model for simplicity.
Here are the illustrative plots for steps 3, 4, and 5:
Step 3: Light Curve Fitting :
Step 4: Calibration using a Training Set :
Step 5: Distance Estimation :
These visualizations offer a simplified view of the steps involved in a supernova survey. The actual processes are more sophisticated and require meticulous calibration, error analysis, and detailed modeling. But these illustrations provide a conceptual understanding of how raw observations are transformed into valuable cosmological information.
# Simulating data for the steps
# Step 3: Light Curve Fitting
time = np.linspace(-20, 50, 100) # Days relative to peak brightness
true_light_curve = np.exp(-0.5 * ((time - 5)/15)**2) # Toy Gaussian light curve
observed_light_curve = true_light_curve + np.random.normal(0, 0.05, len(time)) # Adding some observational noise
# Step 4: Calibration using a Training Set
# Let's imagine we have a set of 50 supernovae with known distances
num_calibration = 50
calibration_x1_values = np.random.normal(0, 1, num_calibration)
calibration_c_values = np.random.normal(0, 0.1, num_calibration)
# Generate intrinsic brightnesses based on true alpha, beta and some scatter
calibration_brightnesses = -19 + true_alpha * calibration_x1_values - true_beta * calibration_c_values + np.random.normal(0, 0.1, num_calibration)
# Step 5: Distance Estimation
# For simplicity, let's just plot the distribution of estimated distances
# using the derived x1 and c values and the true alpha and beta
estimated_distances = base_distance_modulus + true_alpha * x1_values - true_beta * c_values
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(18, 5))
# Step 3 Plot
plt.subplot(1, 3, 1)
plt.plot(time, observed_light_curve, 'o', label="Observed Light Curve", color='blue')
plt.plot(time, true_light_curve, label="True Light Curve", color='red')
plt.xlabel('Time (days)')
plt.ylabel('Brightness')
plt.title('Step 3: Light Curve Fitting')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
# Step 4 Plot
plt.subplot(1, 3, 2)
plt.scatter(calibration_x1_values, calibration_brightnesses, c=calibration_c_values, cmap='viridis', edgecolor='k')
plt.colorbar(label='Color (c)')
plt.xlabel('Stretch ($x_1$)')
plt.ylabel('Intrinsic Brightness')
plt.title('Step 4: Calibration using Training Set')
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
# Step 5 Plot
plt.subplot(1, 3, 3)
plt.hist(estimated_distances, bins=15, color='green', edgecolor='k')
plt.xlabel('Estimated Distance Modulus')
plt.ylabel('Number of Supernovae')
plt.title('Step 5: Distance Estimation')
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
A supernova is observed in multiple filters, such as ultraviolet (U), blue (B), green (V), and red (R). Each filter will capture the brightness of the supernova at different wavelengths and will give us a light curve in that specific filter.
Once we have the light curves from all the filters, we can combine them to construct the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of the supernova at each time point.
Let's proceed with this simulation and visualization.
Here are the visualizations based on our toy model:
Light Curves in Individual Filters :
SED at Peak Brightness :
By combining observations from different filters, astronomers can construct the SED of a supernova and gain insights into its spectral properties, temperature, and composition. This combined information is crucial for understanding the underlying physics of the supernova and for standardizing its brightness for cosmological studies.
# Simulating individual filter light curves
# Base light curve (similar to what we used before)
base_curve = np.exp(-0.5 * ((time - 5)/15)**2)
# Different filters will have different peak times and amplitudes
U_curve = 0.9 * base_curve + np.random.normal(0, 0.05, len(time))
B_curve = 1.1 * np.roll(base_curve, 2) + np.random.normal(0, 0.05, len(time)) # A 2-day shift for illustration
V_curve = base_curve + np.random.normal(0, 0.05, len(time))
R_curve = 0.8 * np.roll(base_curve, -3) + np.random.normal(0, 0.05, len(time)) # A 3-day shift for illustration
# SED at a specific time point (let's choose the peak of the base curve, i.e., day 5)
sed_wavelengths = [365, 445, 551, 658] # Representative central wavelengths for U, B, V, and R in nm
sed_fluxes = [U_curve[25], B_curve[25], V_curve[25], R_curve[25]] # Values at the peak of the base curve
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(15, 6))
# Individual filter light curves
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.plot(time, U_curve, label='U Filter', color='purple')
plt.plot(time, B_curve, label='B Filter', color='blue')
plt.plot(time, V_curve, label='V Filter', color='green')
plt.plot(time, R_curve, label='R Filter', color='red')
plt.xlabel('Time (days)')
plt.ylabel('Brightness')
plt.title('Light Curves in Individual Filters')
plt.legend()
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
# SED at the peak of the light curve
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.scatter(sed_wavelengths, sed_fluxes, color=['purple', 'blue', 'green', 'red'], s=100)
plt.xlabel('Wavelength (nm)')
plt.ylabel('Flux')
plt.title('SED at Peak Brightness (Day 5)')
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
Luminosity (or brightness) as a function of time for a supernova is represented by its light curve. When you gather light curves from a sample of multiple Type Ia supernovae, you'll notice variability in both the shape (stretch) and the peak brightness (color and intrinsic variability).
The stretch and color correction process aims to standardize these light curves so that Type Ia supernovae can be treated as "standard candles."
Here's what you might expect:
Before Correction :
After Correction :
Let's simulate and visualize this. We'll create a set of light curves for a sample of Type Ia supernovae, both before and after applying stretch and color corrections.
Here are the simulated light curves for a sample of Type Ia supernovae:
Before Correction (Left Panel):
After Correction (Right Panel):
This visualization offers a simplistic representation of how stretch and color corrections can help in making Type Ia supernovae more consistent in their light curve properties, enabling their use as "standard candles" in cosmology. In real-world applications, the corrections are more nuanced and are based on detailed models and empirical calibrations.
# Simulating multiple Type Ia supernova light curves
num_sn = 10 # Number of supernovae to simulate
# Generate random stretch and color values for our sample
stretch_factors = np.random.uniform(0.8, 1.2, num_sn)
color_offsets = np.random.uniform(-0.2, 0.2, num_sn)
# Generate individual light curves based on the base_curve
light_curves = []
for i in range(num_sn):
stretched_time = time * stretch_factors[i]
stretched_curve = np.interp(time, stretched_time, base_curve)
color_corrected_curve = stretched_curve + color_offsets[i]
light_curves.append(color_corrected_curve)
# After correction
corrected_light_curves = []
for curve, stretch, color in zip(light_curves, stretch_factors, color_offsets):
# Stretch correction (reverse the stretch)
unstretched_time = time / stretch
unstretched_curve = np.interp(time, unstretched_time, curve)
# Color correction (reverse the color offset)
corrected_curve = unstretched_curve - color
corrected_light_curves.append(corrected_curve)
# Plotting
plt.figure(figsize=(15, 6))
# Before Correction
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
for curve in light_curves:
plt.plot(time, curve)
plt.xlabel('Time (days)')
plt.ylabel('Brightness')
plt.title('Light Curves Before Correction')
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
# After Correction
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
for curve in corrected_light_curves:
plt.plot(time, curve)
plt.xlabel('Time (days)')
plt.ylabel('Brightness')
plt.title('Light Curves After Correction')
plt.grid(True, ls="--", c='0.7')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
More about : the process of calibrating Type Ia supernovae to serve as "standard candles" in cosmological studies. The idea is that, while Type Ia supernovae are generally consistent in their intrinsic brightness, there are still variations among them. These variations, particularly in terms of how the light curve stretches and the supernova's color, are captured by the parameters ( x_1 ) and ( c ). However, to truly use these supernovae as standard candles, we need to understand how these variations relate to intrinsic brightness. This is where ( \alpha ) and ( \beta ) come in.
Here's the rationale behind the statement:
Training Set with Known Distances :
Determining ( $\alpha$ ) and ( $\beta$ ) :
Why it's Important :
In essence, this calibration step is about "training" our standard candle on a known dataset, so it can then be reliably used on unknown datasets. This approach is a cornerstone of many measurement techniques in science.